Uncategorized
January 18, 2018 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
In 1992, in Quill Corp. v. South Dakota, 504 U.S. 298, the Supreme Court ruled that a catalog retailer needs a physical presence in a state to require it to collect sales taxes. With the explosion of online sales, movement has been afoot to revisit this ruling. When the all-important Oz of the Supreme Court, Justice […]
Read more »
January 12, 2018 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
So let’s start the New Year right with a shout out to another blogger, my nephew, Connor Finch. A recent graduate of the University of Virginia Law School and on his way to a job in DC, he’s spent time in between with the ACLU of Virginia. He recently blogged about a case just argued […]
December 20, 2017 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
We are off for the holidays, and so end the year with a quick review of recent decisions from the Law Court and First Circuit. Thanks to all for reading and for the feedback received in 2017. A surprising number of folks seem interested in reading about Maine law – we had 400 readers on […]
December 15, 2017 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
Looking at the summaries of oral arguments heard last week, one struck my eye, so I listened in. The merits of the dispute go to the legality of the Maine PUC’s net metering rule, an issue we won’t discuss. It’s a jurisdictional issue the Commission raised, with impact beyond this particular case, which I’d like […]
December 13, 2017 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
There were a slew of decisions issued by the Law Court last Thursday. Let’s take a peek and discuss a few. A smelly oops State of Maine v. Dubois Livestock, Inc., 2017 ME 223. The holding is that when someone has a license issued by the DEP permit, at least under 38 M.R.S. s. 347-C […]
December 8, 2017 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
Spanked You can’t be compelled to arbitrate a claim if you never signed an agreement to arbitrate, or even knew it existed. That’s the bottom line of a November 21 decision, Ouadani v. TF Final Mile LLC, No. 17-1583. Seem fairly logical to you? Me too. And to the Court (Judges Lynch and Selya, with our […]
December 4, 2017 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
This quarter’s Maine Bar Journal has an article by an attorney, Jeff Goldman, of counsel at Morgan, Lewis in Boston. It’s called The Law Court’s Troubling Opinion of the Justices, and criticizes the Maine Supreme Judicial Court’s unanimous advisory opinion on the Ranked Choice Voting (“RCV”) statute. Contrary to the title and vocabulary of the […]
November 28, 2017 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
I don’t comment on the substance of matters pending before the Law Court that involve me, but we were involved in an oral argument recently that reminded us of a useful tool in preparing for briefing and argument that is generally applicable, whatever the substantive issue in the appeal might be. The argument that reminded […]
November 21, 2017 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
A few entries ago, summarizing the First Circuit Judicial Conference, we noted how a Harvard librarian explained how attempts were being made to address “link rot” – when opinions cite to a website, and later, that cite disappears (and if not gone, you don’t know if the site has been changed since the opinion was […]
November 14, 2017 / March 4, 2026 by Pierce Atwood Litigation
The Supreme Court issued a decision last week made for appellate wonks, in which the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers (where I am a board member) not only filed an amicus brief supporting the position where the unanimous Court landed (AAAL Brief), but got a shout out in a footnote – Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing […]
